Africa vs Eswatini: Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals
Africa
97 t
in 2023
Eswatini
2 t
in 2023
Africa rank
2nd
Eswatini rank
2nd
Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals over time
- Africa
- Eswatini
How they compare
Africa currently reports 97 t against 2 t in Eswatini, a difference of 95 t.
That makes Africa's figure about 48.5 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Africa ahead.
Africa ranks 2nd and Eswatini ranks 2nd of 27 groups.
Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.75 t | 0 t | 1.75 t | Africa |
| 2020s | 48 t | 1 t | 47 t | Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — residuals, Africa or Eswatini?
- Africa, at 97 t against 2 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — residuals between Africa and Eswatini?
- 95 t, with Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Eswatini?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Africa and Eswatini rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — residuals?
- Africa ranks 2nd and Eswatini ranks 2nd of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.