Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Romania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Production
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2,233 t
in 2023
Romania
2,100 t
in 2018
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
5th
Romania rank
4th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Production over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Romania
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 2,233 t against 2,100 t in Romania, a difference of 133 t.
That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 5th and Romania ranks 4th of 20 groups.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — production, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Romania?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 2,233 t against 2,100 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — production between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Romania?
- 133 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Romania?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Romania rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — production?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 5th and Romania ranks 4th of 20 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.