Oceania vs Peru: Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses
Oceania
0.19 t
in 2021
Peru
38.41 t
in 2023
Oceania rank
22nd
Peru rank
19th
Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses over time
- Oceania
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 38.41 t against 0.19 t in Oceania, a difference of 38.22 t.
That makes Peru's figure about 202.2 times Oceania's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 19th of 25 groups.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.17 t | 53.31 t | 48.14 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 1.08 t | 39.03 t | 37.95 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — other uses, Oceania or Peru?
- Peru, at 38.41 t against 0.19 t in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — other uses between Oceania and Peru?
- 38.22 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Oceania and Peru rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — other uses?
- Oceania ranks 22nd and Peru ranks 19th of 25 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.