Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Romania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1,811 t
in 2023
Romania
939.88 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
4th
Romania rank
5th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Romania
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1,811 t against 939.88 t in Romania, a difference of 871.12 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.9 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Romania ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and Romania ranks 5th of 25 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Romania Difference Ahead
2010s 866.25 t 3,050 t 2,184 t Romania
2020s 1,817 t 836.94 t 979.76 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — other uses, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Romania?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1,811 t against 939.88 t in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — other uses between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Romania?
871.12 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Romania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Romania rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — other uses?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th and Romania ranks 5th of 25 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Romania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/romania/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Romania: Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
85 places, 976 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.