Brazil vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses

Brazil
346.17 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1,811 t
in 2023
Brazil rank
7th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
4th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses over time

  • Brazil
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
05001.0k1.5k2.0k201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1,811 t against 346.17 t in Brazil, a difference of 1,465 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.2 times Brazil's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 7th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 54 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 291.84 t 866.25 t 574.42 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 369.31 t 1,817 t 1,447 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — other uses, Brazil or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1,811 t against 346.17 t in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — other uses between Brazil and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
1,465 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — other uses?
Brazil ranks 7th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 4th of 54 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-other-uses-non-food/brazil/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-other-uses-non-food/brazil/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Brazil vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
85 places, 976 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.