How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Portugal?

7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia and New Zealand vs Portugal: Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses

Australia and New Zealand

0.19 t

in 2021

Portugal

0.77 t

in 2022

Australia and New Zealand rank

41st

Portugal rank

38th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses over time

Australia and New Zealand
Portugal

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.77 t against 0.19 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.58 t.

That makes Portugal's figure about 4.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Portugal ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st and Portugal ranks 38th of 54 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia and New Zealand	Portugal	Difference	Ahead
2010s	6.08 t	6.92 t	0.84 t	Portugal
2020s	1.08 t	1.55 t	0.47 t	Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — other uses, Australia and New Zealand or Portugal?: Portugal, at 0.77 t against 0.19 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — other uses between Australia and New Zealand and Portugal?: 0.58 t, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Portugal?: 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Portugal rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — other uses?: Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st and Portugal ranks 38th of 54 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Portugal: Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-other-uses-non-food/australia-and-new-zealand/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-other-uses-non-food/australia-and-new-zealand/portugal/">Australia and New Zealand vs Portugal: Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw silk (not thrown) — Other uses (non-food)
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 85 places, 976 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.