Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Peru: Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
107.18 t
in 2023
Peru
38.56 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
13th
Peru rank
14th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Peru
0255075100201020162023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 107.18 t against 38.56 t in Peru, a difference of 68.62 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.8 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th and Peru ranks 14th of 27 groups.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Peru Difference Ahead
2010s 21.35 t 49.5 t 28.15 t Peru
2020s 34.31 t 43.62 t 9.3 t Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Peru?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 107.18 t against 38.56 t in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Peru?
68.62 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Peru?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Peru rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th and Peru ranks 14th of 27 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Peru: Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-import-quantity/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-import-quantity/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/peru/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Peru: Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
123 places, 1,340 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.