Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity, Bangladesh or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?

Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 216.75 t against 109.56 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.

What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity between Bangladesh and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?

107.19 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?

14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bangladesh vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity

Bangladesh

109.56 t

in 2023

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

216.75 t

in 2023

Bangladesh rank

10th

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank

3rd

Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity over time

Bangladesh
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 216.75 t against 109.56 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 107.19 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 2.0 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 10th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 86 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bangladesh	Least Developed Countries (LDCs)	Difference	Ahead
2010s	78.57 t	135.76 t	57.19 t	Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s	75.69 t	107.43 t	31.75 t	Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity, Bangladesh or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?: Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 216.75 t against 109.56 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity between Bangladesh and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?: 107.19 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity?: Bangladesh ranks 10th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-import-quantity/bangladesh/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-import-quantity/bangladesh/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Bangladesh vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 123 places, 1,340 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.