Bahamas vs Botswana: Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity

Bahamas
0.01 t
in 2023
Botswana
0.01 t
in 2017
Bahamas rank
67th
Botswana rank
67th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity over time

  • Bahamas
  • Botswana
01234201020162023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.01 t against 0.01 t in Botswana, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Botswana ahead.

Bahamas ranks 67th and Botswana ranks 67th of 92 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity, Bahamas or Botswana?
Bahamas, at 0.01 t against 0.01 t in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity between Bahamas and Botswana?
0 t, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Botswana?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
How do Bahamas and Botswana rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity?
Bahamas ranks 67th and Botswana ranks 67th of 92 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
123 places, 1,340 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.