Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?

Australia, at 0.53 t against 0.53 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.

How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?

11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity

Australia

0.53 t

in 2022

Australia and New Zealand

0.53 t

in 2022

Australia rank

40th

Australia and New Zealand rank

40th

Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity over time

Australia
Australia and New Zealand

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.53 t against 0.53 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 40th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 40th of 86 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Australia and New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
2010s	3.21 t	3.26 t	0.055 t	Australia and New Zealand
2020s	0.53 t	0.53 t	0 t	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?: Australia, at 0.53 t against 0.53 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?: 0 t, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?: 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for raw silk (not thrown) — import quantity?: Australia ranks 40th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 40th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-import-quantity/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-silk-not-thrown-import-quantity/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/">Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw silk (not thrown) — Import quantity
Unit: t
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 123 places, 1,340 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.