Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Raw milk of cattle — Milk Animals, per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.4134 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.4583 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
138th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
136th

Raw milk of cattle — Milk Animals, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.4583 An per square kilometre against 0.4134 An per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0449 An per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Mauritania ranks 138th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 136th of 164 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2501 An per square kilometre 0.7222 An per square kilometre 0.4721 An per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.2078 An per square kilometre 0.5333 An per square kilometre 0.3256 An per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.2344 An per square kilometre 0.6667 An per square kilometre 0.4323 An per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.2922 An per square kilometre 0.7865 An per square kilometre 0.4943 An per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.3328 An per square kilometre 0.7733 An per square kilometre 0.4406 An per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.3754 An per square kilometre 0.3904 An per square kilometre 0.015 An per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.4115 An per square kilometre 0.4448 An per square kilometre 0.0333 An per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — milk animals, per square kilometre, Mauritania or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.4583 An per square kilometre against 0.4134 An per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — milk animals, per square kilometre between Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0449 An per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for raw milk of cattle — milk animals, per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 138th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 136th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Milk Animals, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Raw milk of cattle — Milk Animals, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-milk-animals-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-milk-animals-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Raw milk of cattle — Milk Animals, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Milk Animals, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 9,383 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Milk Animals divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.