How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mexico?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Mexico: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iceland

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Mexico

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Iceland rank

80th

Mexico rank

81st

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Iceland
Mexico

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Mexico, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 80th and Mexico ranks 81st of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Mexico	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1970s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Mexico?: Iceland, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Mexico as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Mexico?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mexico?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Mexico rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Iceland ranks 80th and Mexico ranks 81st of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mexico: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/iceland/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/iceland/mexico/">Iceland vs Mexico: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 6,761 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.