How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Nepal?

59 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gambia vs Nepal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Gambia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Nepal

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Gambia rank

13th

Nepal rank

16th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Gambia
Nepal

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Nepal, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Nepal ahead.

Gambia ranks 13th and Nepal ranks 16th of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gambia	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Gambia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Gambia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Gambia
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Gambia or Nepal?: Gambia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Gambia and Nepal?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Nepal?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.
How do Gambia and Nepal rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Gambia ranks 13th and Nepal ranks 16th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Nepal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/nepal/">Gambia vs Nepal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 6,761 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.