How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Tunisia?

56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Tunisia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Tunisia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chad rank

19th

Tunisia rank

22nd

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chad
Tunisia

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Tunisia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 19th and Tunisia ranks 22nd of 128 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Tunisia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
1970s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
1980s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or Tunisia?: Chad, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Tunisia as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and Tunisia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Tunisia?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chad and Tunisia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chad ranks 19th and Tunisia ranks 22nd of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Tunisia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/tunisia/">Chad vs Tunisia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 6,761 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.