How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Ireland?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bangladesh vs Ireland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bangladesh

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Ireland

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Bangladesh rank

35th

Ireland rank

34th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Bangladesh
Ireland

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 35th and Ireland ranks 34th of 128 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bangladesh	Ireland	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ireland
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ireland
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ireland
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ireland
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ireland
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bangladesh or Ireland?: Ireland, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bangladesh as of 2017.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bangladesh and Ireland?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Ireland?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Bangladesh and Ireland rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Bangladesh ranks 35th and Ireland ranks 34th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Ireland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/ireland/">Bangladesh vs Ireland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 6,761 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.