Rwanda vs Uruguay: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Rwanda
3.88 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
48th
Uruguay rank
45th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Uruguay
01234196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.88 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.27 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Rwanda ranks 48th and Uruguay ranks 45th of 128 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4206 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9832 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.683 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7211 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1306 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 1.87 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4524 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 2.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3298 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 3.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4736 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 3.96 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3743 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Rwanda or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.88 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Rwanda and Uruguay?
0.27 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Uruguay rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Rwanda ranks 48th and Uruguay ranks 45th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Uruguay: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/rwanda/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/rwanda/uruguay/">Rwanda vs Uruguay: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.