Qatar vs Zambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Qatar
0.6985 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.9191 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar rank
90th
Zambia rank
87th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Qatar
  • Zambia
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.9191 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6985 1000 USD per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 0.2206 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Qatar's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.

Qatar ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 87th of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2063 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0684 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.138 1000 USD per square kilometre Qatar
1970s 0.4507 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0858 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3649 1000 USD per square kilometre Qatar
1980s 0.6102 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1116 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4986 1000 USD per square kilometre Qatar
1990s 0.8756 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1316 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.744 1000 USD per square kilometre Qatar
2000s 0.4922 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6611 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1689 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.6781 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6925 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0144 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.6985 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.826 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1274 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Qatar or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.9191 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6985 1000 USD per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Qatar and Zambia?
0.2206 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Zambia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Qatar ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 87th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Zambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/qatar/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/qatar/zambia/">Qatar vs Zambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.