How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malawi?

28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kazakhstan vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Kazakhstan

0.4365 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Malawi

0.4822 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan rank

100th

Malawi rank

98th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Kazakhstan
Malawi

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.4822 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4365 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0457 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 100th and Malawi ranks 98th of 128 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kazakhstan	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.4368 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2349 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2019 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.5808 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2216 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3592 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	0.3376 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.396 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0584 1000 USD per square kilometre	Malawi
2020s	0.4185 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4599 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0415 1000 USD per square kilometre	Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Kazakhstan or Malawi?: Malawi, at 0.4822 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4365 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Kazakhstan and Malawi?: 0.0457 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malawi?: 28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Malawi rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Kazakhstan ranks 100th and Malawi ranks 98th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/kazakhstan/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/kazakhstan/malawi/">Kazakhstan vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.