Jamaica vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Jamaica
0.6046 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.4822 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
96th
Malawi rank
98th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Malawi
0123196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.6046 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4822 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.1224 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.3 times Malawi's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 96th and Malawi ranks 98th of 128 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0929 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.62 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 2.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1691 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.64 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 2.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2761 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.52 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2395 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.66 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2216 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7936 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.7453 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.396 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3492 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.6806 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4599 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2206 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Jamaica or Malawi?
Jamaica, at 0.6046 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4822 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Jamaica and Malawi?
0.1224 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Malawi rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Jamaica ranks 96th and Malawi ranks 98th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/jamaica/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/jamaica/malawi/">Jamaica vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.