Iceland vs Mauritius: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iceland
0.9368 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.8898 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
86th
Mauritius rank
88th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritius
02468196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.9368 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8898 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.047 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Iceland ranks 86th and Mauritius ranks 88th of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7142 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.94 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.767 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.62 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.7149 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.42 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.6499 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.84 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.6925 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5322 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.841 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.488 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.9267 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8075 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1192 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Mauritius?
Iceland, at 0.9368 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8898 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Mauritius?
0.047 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritius rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iceland ranks 86th and Mauritius ranks 88th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritius: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/iceland/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/iceland/mauritius/">Iceland vs Mauritius: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.