Ghana vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ghana
0.0201 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
122nd
Namibia rank
121st

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ghana
  • Namibia
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0201 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 0.0329 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 2.6 times Ghana's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 121st of 128 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0055 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.045 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0395 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0068 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0306 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0238 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.008 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0323 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0242 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0121 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0362 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0241 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0151 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0485 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0334 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0171 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0528 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0356 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0196 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0505 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0309 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ghana or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0201 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ghana and Namibia?
0.0329 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Namibia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ghana ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 121st of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ghana/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ghana/namibia/">Ghana vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.