Egypt vs Mexico: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Egypt
2.25 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
2.64 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
68th
Mexico rank
65th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Egypt
  • Mexico
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 2.64 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.25 1000 USD per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.39 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Egypt ranks 68th and Mexico ranks 65th of 128 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2188 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5479 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3291 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.3121 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7687 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.4113 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8861 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.6195 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8164 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 1.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.93 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6646 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7387 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2045 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Egypt or Mexico?
Mexico, at 2.64 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.25 1000 USD per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Egypt and Mexico?
0.39 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Mexico rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Egypt ranks 68th and Mexico ranks 65th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Mexico: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/mexico/">Egypt vs Mexico: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.