Ecuador vs Kenya: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
3.99 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya
4.49 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
46th
Kenya rank
44th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Kenya
12345196119922023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 4.49 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.99 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.5 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 46th and Kenya ranks 44th of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Kenya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9781 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.708 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.27 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8958 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4508 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 2.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.394 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 3.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4098 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 4.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.61 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4468 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 4.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2876 1000 USD per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Kenya?
Kenya, at 4.49 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.99 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Kenya?
0.5 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 46th and Kenya ranks 44th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kenya: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ecuador/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ecuador/kenya/">Ecuador vs Kenya: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.