Chad vs Indonesia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad
0.1881 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
0.2414 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
110th
Indonesia rank
108th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chad
  • Indonesia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 0.2414 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1881 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0533 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.3 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 110th and Indonesia ranks 108th of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Indonesia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Indonesia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0845 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0116 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0728 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0768 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.016 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0608 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0805 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0604 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0201 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0868 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1252 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0384 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 0.1011 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1783 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0772 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 0.1374 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2782 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1408 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 0.1787 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2803 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1016 1000 USD per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 0.2414 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1881 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and Indonesia?
0.0533 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Indonesia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Indonesia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chad ranks 110th and Indonesia ranks 108th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Indonesia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chad/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chad/indonesia/">Chad vs Indonesia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.