Canada vs Mauritius: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Canada
0.6871 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.8898 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
91st
Mauritius rank
88th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Canada
  • Mauritius
02468196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.8898 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6871 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.2027 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Canada's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 91st and Mauritius ranks 88th of 128 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5694 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.09 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.5279 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.86 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.5193 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.61 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.5376 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.96 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.5465 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6782 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.5842 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7449 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.6756 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8075 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1319 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Canada or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.8898 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6871 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Canada and Mauritius?
0.2027 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Mauritius rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Canada ranks 91st and Mauritius ranks 88th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Mauritius: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/canada/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/canada/mauritius/">Canada vs Mauritius: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.