Cambodia vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Cambodia
0.0132 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
124th
Namibia rank
121st

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Cambodia
  • Namibia
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0132 1000 USD per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 0.0398 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 4.0 times Cambodia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 124th and Namibia ranks 121st of 128 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0085 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.045 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0365 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0093 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0306 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0213 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0087 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0323 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0235 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0119 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0362 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0242 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0137 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0485 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0348 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0528 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.039 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0132 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0505 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0373 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cambodia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0132 1000 USD per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cambodia and Namibia?
0.0398 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Namibia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Cambodia ranks 124th and Namibia ranks 121st of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/cambodia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/cambodia/namibia/">Cambodia vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.