Botswana vs Congo: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Botswana
0.0087 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0134 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
126th
Congo rank
123rd

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0134 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0087 1000 USD per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0047 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 126th and Congo ranks 123rd of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0192 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.018 1000 USD per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 0.0238 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0217 1000 USD per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.0314 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0028 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0286 1000 USD per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.0138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.0119 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0093 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0026 1000 USD per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.0102 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0119 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0081 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0134 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0052 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Botswana or Congo?
Congo, at 0.0134 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0087 1000 USD per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Botswana and Congo?
0.0047 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Botswana ranks 126th and Congo ranks 123rd of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/botswana/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/botswana/congo-rep/">Botswana vs Congo: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.