Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
3.77 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
3.73 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
49th
Finland rank
50th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Finland
23456196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.77 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.73 1000 USD per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Finland ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th and Finland ranks 50th of 128 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Finland Difference Ahead
1990s 2.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8791 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2000s 4.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.37 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 4.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.815 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Finland?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.77 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.73 1000 USD per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland?
0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland?
22 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2017.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Finland rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th and Finland ranks 50th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bosnia-and-herzegovina/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bosnia-and-herzegovina/finland/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Finland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.