Bhutan vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan
0.6249 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.4822 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
95th
Malawi rank
98th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Malawi
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.6249 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4822 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.1427 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.3 times Malawi's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 95th and Malawi ranks 98th of 128 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2087 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0929 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1158 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.2652 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1691 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.096 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.3257 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2761 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0496 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.3543 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2395 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1148 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.3246 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2216 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.103 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.5681 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.396 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1721 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.7072 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4599 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2473 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Malawi?
Bhutan, at 0.6249 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4822 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Malawi?
0.1427 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Malawi rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bhutan ranks 95th and Malawi ranks 98th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bhutan/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bhutan/malawi/">Bhutan vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.