How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Costa Rica: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Belarus

12.46 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Costa Rica

12.55 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

26th

Costa Rica rank

25th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Belarus
Costa Rica

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 12.55 1000 USD per square kilometre against 12.46 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.09 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 26th and Costa Rica ranks 25th of 128 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Costa Rica	Difference	Ahead
1990s	7.63 1000 USD per square kilometre	5.56 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.07 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	8.07 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7408 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	10.36 1000 USD per square kilometre	9.89 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4781 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	11.87 1000 USD per square kilometre	11.41 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4644 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Belarus or Costa Rica?: Costa Rica, at 12.55 1000 USD per square kilometre against 12.46 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Belarus and Costa Rica?: 0.09 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Belarus ranks 26th and Costa Rica ranks 25th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Costa Rica: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belarus/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/belarus/costa-rica/">Belarus vs Costa Rica: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.