Argentina vs Brazil: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Argentina
1.46 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
1.63 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
76th
Brazil rank
74th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Argentina
  • Brazil
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 1.63 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.46 1000 USD per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0.17 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 76th and Brazil ranks 74th of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Brazil in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5537 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.288 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2657 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 0.654 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4043 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2497 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 0.7204 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5701 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1503 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7796 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2495 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 1.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1569 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 1.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1564 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Argentina or Brazil?
Brazil, at 1.63 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.46 1000 USD per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Argentina and Brazil?
0.17 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Brazil?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Brazil rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Argentina ranks 76th and Brazil ranks 74th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Brazil: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/argentina/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/argentina/brazil/">Argentina vs Brazil: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.