Angola vs Nigeria: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola
0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
0.1298 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
117th
Nigeria rank
116th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Angola
  • Nigeria
0.0250.050.0750.10.1250.15196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0.1298 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0563 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.8 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 117th and Nigeria ranks 116th of 128 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0411 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0428 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
1970s 0.0472 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0614 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0143 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 0.0527 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0764 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0237 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 0.0542 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0936 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0394 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 0.0622 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1055 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0434 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 0.0672 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1305 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0632 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 0.0726 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1291 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0565 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 0.1298 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0735 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Nigeria?
0.0563 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Nigeria rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 117th and Nigeria ranks 116th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Nigeria: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/angola/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/angola/nigeria/">Angola vs Nigeria: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
129 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.