How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zimbabwe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Thailand

0.0091 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0.0122 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Thailand rank

96th

Zimbabwe rank

94th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Thailand
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0122 1000 USD per person against 0.0091 1000 USD per person in Thailand, a difference of 0.0031 1000 USD per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Thailand's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Thailand ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 94th of 128 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Thailand	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per person	0.0275 1000 USD per person	0.0275 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1970s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0306 1000 USD per person	0.0304 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1980s	0.0006 1000 USD per person	0.0234 1000 USD per person	0.0228 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1990s	0.0012 1000 USD per person	0.0213 1000 USD per person	0.0201 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0082 1000 USD per person	0.0132 1000 USD per person	0.005 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.0092 1000 USD per person	0.0123 1000 USD per person	0.0031 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Thailand or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0122 1000 USD per person against 0.0091 1000 USD per person in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Thailand and Zimbabwe?: 0.0031 1000 USD per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zimbabwe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Thailand and Zimbabwe rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Thailand ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 94th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/thailand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/thailand/zimbabwe/">Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.