How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Sri Lanka

0.0084 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0.0122 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Sri Lanka rank

97th

Zimbabwe rank

94th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Sri Lanka
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0122 1000 USD per person against 0.0084 1000 USD per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0038 1000 USD per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Sri Lanka's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Sri Lanka ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 94th of 128 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sri Lanka	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0038 1000 USD per person	0.0275 1000 USD per person	0.0237 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1970s	0.0043 1000 USD per person	0.0306 1000 USD per person	0.0263 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1980s	0.0045 1000 USD per person	0.0234 1000 USD per person	0.0189 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1990s	0.0048 1000 USD per person	0.0213 1000 USD per person	0.0165 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0055 1000 USD per person	0.0132 1000 USD per person	0.0077 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.0083 1000 USD per person	0.0123 1000 USD per person	0.004 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0122 1000 USD per person against 0.0084 1000 USD per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?: 0.0038 1000 USD per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Sri Lanka ranks 97th and Zimbabwe ranks 94th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/sri-lanka/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/sri-lanka/zimbabwe/">Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.