How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Niger?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs Niger: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Namibia

0.0141 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Niger

0.0143 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Namibia rank

89th

Niger rank

88th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Namibia
Niger

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.0143 1000 USD per person against 0.0141 1000 USD per person in Namibia, a difference of 0.0002 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 89th and Niger ranks 88th of 128 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	Niger	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0563 1000 USD per person	0.0096 1000 USD per person	0.0467 1000 USD per person	Namibia
1970s	0.0293 1000 USD per person	0.0067 1000 USD per person	0.0227 1000 USD per person	Namibia
1980s	0.0243 1000 USD per person	0.0079 1000 USD per person	0.0164 1000 USD per person	Namibia
1990s	0.019 1000 USD per person	0.0081 1000 USD per person	0.0109 1000 USD per person	Namibia
2000s	0.0205 1000 USD per person	0.0103 1000 USD per person	0.0101 1000 USD per person	Namibia
2010s	0.0186 1000 USD per person	0.0118 1000 USD per person	0.0068 1000 USD per person	Namibia
2020s	0.0145 1000 USD per person	0.0138 1000 USD per person	0.0007 1000 USD per person	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Namibia or Niger?: Niger, at 0.0143 1000 USD per person against 0.0141 1000 USD per person in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Namibia and Niger?: 0.0002 1000 USD per person, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Niger?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Namibia and Niger rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Namibia ranks 89th and Niger ranks 88th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Niger: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/namibia/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/namibia/niger/">Namibia vs Niger: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.