How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Nepal?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea vs Nepal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Guinea

0.0175 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Nepal

0.0198 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Guinea rank

83rd

Nepal rank

81st

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Guinea
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0198 1000 USD per person against 0.0175 1000 USD per person in Guinea, a difference of 0.0023 1000 USD per person.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 83rd and Nepal ranks 81st of 128 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0087 1000 USD per person	0.0069 1000 USD per person	0.0018 1000 USD per person	Guinea
1970s	0.0083 1000 USD per person	0.006 1000 USD per person	0.0022 1000 USD per person	Guinea
1980s	0.0085 1000 USD per person	0.0057 1000 USD per person	0.0028 1000 USD per person	Guinea
1990s	0.0089 1000 USD per person	0.006 1000 USD per person	0.0029 1000 USD per person	Guinea
2000s	0.012 1000 USD per person	0.0066 1000 USD per person	0.0054 1000 USD per person	Guinea
2010s	0.016 1000 USD per person	0.0095 1000 USD per person	0.0065 1000 USD per person	Guinea
2020s	0.018 1000 USD per person	0.0173 1000 USD per person	0.0006 1000 USD per person	Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Guinea or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0.0198 1000 USD per person against 0.0175 1000 USD per person in Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Guinea and Nepal?: 0.0023 1000 USD per person, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Nepal?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Guinea and Nepal rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Guinea ranks 83rd and Nepal ranks 81st of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Nepal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/guinea/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/guinea/nepal/">Guinea vs Nepal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.