How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Nepal?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Egypt vs Nepal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Egypt

0.0208 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Nepal

0.0198 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Egypt rank

79th

Nepal rank

81st

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Egypt
Nepal

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.0208 1000 USD per person against 0.0198 1000 USD per person in Nepal, a difference of 0.001 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Egypt ranks 79th and Nepal ranks 81st of 128 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Egypt	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0071 1000 USD per person	0.0069 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	Egypt
1970s	0.0081 1000 USD per person	0.006 1000 USD per person	0.0021 1000 USD per person	Egypt
1980s	0.0081 1000 USD per person	0.0057 1000 USD per person	0.0025 1000 USD per person	Egypt
1990s	0.0094 1000 USD per person	0.006 1000 USD per person	0.0035 1000 USD per person	Egypt
2000s	0.0156 1000 USD per person	0.0066 1000 USD per person	0.009 1000 USD per person	Egypt
2010s	0.0153 1000 USD per person	0.0095 1000 USD per person	0.0058 1000 USD per person	Egypt
2020s	0.021 1000 USD per person	0.0173 1000 USD per person	0.0037 1000 USD per person	Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Egypt or Nepal?: Egypt, at 0.0208 1000 USD per person against 0.0198 1000 USD per person in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Egypt and Nepal?: 0.001 1000 USD per person, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Nepal?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Egypt and Nepal rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Egypt ranks 79th and Nepal ranks 81st of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Nepal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/nepal/">Egypt vs Nepal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.