How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malta?

57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Malta: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador

0.0511 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malta

0.0542 1000 USD per person

in 2017

Ecuador rank

53rd

Malta rank

50th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Ecuador
Malta

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0542 1000 USD per person against 0.0511 1000 USD per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0031 1000 USD per person.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 53rd and Malta ranks 50th of 128 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0507 1000 USD per person	0.0322 1000 USD per person	0.0184 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1970s	0.053 1000 USD per person	0.0523 1000 USD per person	0.0007 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1980s	0.0457 1000 USD per person	0.0499 1000 USD per person	0.0041 1000 USD per person	Malta
1990s	0.056 1000 USD per person	0.0697 1000 USD per person	0.0137 1000 USD per person	Malta
2000s	0.0627 1000 USD per person	0.0651 1000 USD per person	0.0025 1000 USD per person	Malta
2010s	0.0629 1000 USD per person	0.0598 1000 USD per person	0.0031 1000 USD per person	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Malta?: Malta, at 0.0542 1000 USD per person against 0.0511 1000 USD per person in Ecuador as of 2017.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Malta?: 0.0031 1000 USD per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malta?: 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Ecuador and Malta rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Ecuador ranks 53rd and Malta ranks 50th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malta: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/malta/">Ecuador vs Malta: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.