How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Kenya: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador

0.0511 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Kenya

0.054 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Ecuador rank

53rd

Kenya rank

51st

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Ecuador
Kenya

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 0.054 1000 USD per person against 0.0511 1000 USD per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0029 1000 USD per person.

That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 53rd and Kenya ranks 51st of 128 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Kenya	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0507 1000 USD per person	0.0431 1000 USD per person	0.0076 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1970s	0.053 1000 USD per person	0.0384 1000 USD per person	0.0146 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1980s	0.0457 1000 USD per person	0.0437 1000 USD per person	0.002 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1990s	0.056 1000 USD per person	0.044 1000 USD per person	0.012 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2000s	0.0627 1000 USD per person	0.049 1000 USD per person	0.0137 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2010s	0.0624 1000 USD per person	0.0445 1000 USD per person	0.0179 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2020s	0.0562 1000 USD per person	0.0487 1000 USD per person	0.0074 1000 USD per person	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Kenya?: Kenya, at 0.054 1000 USD per person against 0.0511 1000 USD per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Kenya?: 0.0029 1000 USD per person, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Ecuador ranks 53rd and Kenya ranks 51st of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kenya: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/kenya/">Ecuador vs Kenya: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.