How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Japan?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Japan: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador

0.0511 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Japan

0.0525 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Ecuador rank

53rd

Japan rank

52nd

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Ecuador
Japan

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.0525 1000 USD per person against 0.0511 1000 USD per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0014 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 53rd and Japan ranks 52nd of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Japan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Japan	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0507 1000 USD per person	0.029 1000 USD per person	0.0217 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1970s	0.053 1000 USD per person	0.0423 1000 USD per person	0.0108 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1980s	0.0457 1000 USD per person	0.0529 1000 USD per person	0.0072 1000 USD per person	Japan
1990s	0.056 1000 USD per person	0.0599 1000 USD per person	0.0039 1000 USD per person	Japan
2000s	0.0627 1000 USD per person	0.057 1000 USD per person	0.0056 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2010s	0.0624 1000 USD per person	0.0517 1000 USD per person	0.0107 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2020s	0.0562 1000 USD per person	0.0528 1000 USD per person	0.0034 1000 USD per person	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Japan?: Japan, at 0.0525 1000 USD per person against 0.0511 1000 USD per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Japan?: 0.0014 1000 USD per person, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Japan?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Japan rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Ecuador ranks 53rd and Japan ranks 52nd of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Japan: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/japan/">Ecuador vs Japan: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.