How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Paraguay?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Paraguay: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile

0.0396 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Paraguay

0.0378 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Chile rank

61st

Paraguay rank

63rd

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chile
Paraguay

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0396 1000 USD per person against 0.0378 1000 USD per person in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0018 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 61st and Paraguay ranks 63rd of 128 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Paraguay	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0317 1000 USD per person	0.0185 1000 USD per person	0.0132 1000 USD per person	Chile
1970s	0.0317 1000 USD per person	0.0204 1000 USD per person	0.0113 1000 USD per person	Chile
1980s	0.0302 1000 USD per person	0.0244 1000 USD per person	0.0058 1000 USD per person	Chile
1990s	0.0418 1000 USD per person	0.0341 1000 USD per person	0.0077 1000 USD per person	Chile
2000s	0.0476 1000 USD per person	0.0335 1000 USD per person	0.0141 1000 USD per person	Chile
2010s	0.0432 1000 USD per person	0.0384 1000 USD per person	0.0048 1000 USD per person	Chile
2020s	0.04 1000 USD per person	0.0382 1000 USD per person	0.0018 1000 USD per person	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Paraguay?: Chile, at 0.0396 1000 USD per person against 0.0378 1000 USD per person in Paraguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Paraguay?: 0.0018 1000 USD per person, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Paraguay?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and Paraguay rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chile ranks 61st and Paraguay ranks 63rd of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Paraguay: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chile/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chile/paraguay/">Chile vs Paraguay: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.