How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Gambia?

56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Gambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad

0.0121 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Gambia

0.0124 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Chad rank

95th

Gambia rank

92nd

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chad
Gambia

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0124 1000 USD per person against 0.0121 1000 USD per person in Chad, a difference of 0.0003 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 95th and Gambia ranks 92nd of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and Gambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Gambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0315 1000 USD per person	0.0048 1000 USD per person	0.0268 1000 USD per person	Chad
1970s	0.0237 1000 USD per person	0.0053 1000 USD per person	0.0184 1000 USD per person	Chad
1980s	0.0201 1000 USD per person	0.0041 1000 USD per person	0.016 1000 USD per person	Chad
1990s	0.0157 1000 USD per person	0.0156 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Chad
2000s	0.0126 1000 USD per person	0.0263 1000 USD per person	0.0137 1000 USD per person	Gambia
2010s	0.0119 1000 USD per person	0.0212 1000 USD per person	0.0092 1000 USD per person	Gambia
2020s	0.0123 1000 USD per person	0.0125 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or Gambia?: Gambia, at 0.0124 1000 USD per person against 0.0121 1000 USD per person in Chad as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and Gambia?: 0.0003 1000 USD per person, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Gambia?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chad and Gambia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chad ranks 95th and Gambia ranks 92nd of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Gambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chad/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chad/gambia-the/">Chad vs Gambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.