How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Ghana?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cambodia vs Ghana: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Cambodia

0.0001 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Ghana

0.0001 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Cambodia rank

127th

Ghana rank

126th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Cambodia
Ghana

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Cambodia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 127th and Ghana ranks 126th of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 6 and Ghana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cambodia	Ghana	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Cambodia
1970s	0.0003 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Cambodia
1980s	0.0003 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Cambodia
1990s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	Cambodia
2000s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	Cambodia
2010s	0.0002 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	Cambodia
2020s	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0.0001 1000 USD per person	0 1000 USD per person	Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cambodia or Ghana?: Ghana, at 0.0001 1000 USD per person against 0.0001 1000 USD per person in Cambodia as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cambodia and Ghana?: 0 1000 USD per person, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Ghana?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cambodia and Ghana rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Cambodia ranks 127th and Ghana ranks 126th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Ghana: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/cambodia/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/cambodia/ghana/">Cambodia vs Ghana: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.