How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Guinea?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Guinea: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Barbados

0.0168 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Guinea

0.0175 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Barbados rank

84th

Guinea rank

83rd

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Barbados
Guinea

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.0175 1000 USD per person against 0.0168 1000 USD per person in Barbados, a difference of 0.0007 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 84th and Guinea ranks 83rd of 128 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Guinea	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0239 1000 USD per person	0.0087 1000 USD per person	0.0151 1000 USD per person	Barbados
1970s	0.0273 1000 USD per person	0.0083 1000 USD per person	0.0191 1000 USD per person	Barbados
1980s	0.0421 1000 USD per person	0.0085 1000 USD per person	0.0336 1000 USD per person	Barbados
1990s	0.041 1000 USD per person	0.0089 1000 USD per person	0.0321 1000 USD per person	Barbados
2000s	0.0296 1000 USD per person	0.012 1000 USD per person	0.0176 1000 USD per person	Barbados
2010s	0.0216 1000 USD per person	0.016 1000 USD per person	0.0056 1000 USD per person	Barbados
2020s	0.0167 1000 USD per person	0.018 1000 USD per person	0.0013 1000 USD per person	Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Barbados or Guinea?: Guinea, at 0.0175 1000 USD per person against 0.0168 1000 USD per person in Barbados as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Barbados and Guinea?: 0.0007 1000 USD per person, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Guinea?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Guinea rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Barbados ranks 84th and Guinea ranks 83rd of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Guinea: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/barbados/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/barbados/guinea/">Barbados vs Guinea: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.