How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs China: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Barbados

0.0168 1000 USD per person

in 2024

China

0.0158 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Barbados rank

84th

China rank

87th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Barbados
China

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0168 1000 USD per person against 0.0158 1000 USD per person in China, a difference of 0.001 1000 USD per person.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 84th and China ranks 87th of 128 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	China	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0239 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	0.0234 1000 USD per person	Barbados
1970s	0.0273 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	0.0268 1000 USD per person	Barbados
1980s	0.0421 1000 USD per person	0.0013 1000 USD per person	0.0408 1000 USD per person	Barbados
1990s	0.041 1000 USD per person	0.0025 1000 USD per person	0.0385 1000 USD per person	Barbados
2000s	0.0296 1000 USD per person	0.0091 1000 USD per person	0.0205 1000 USD per person	Barbados
2010s	0.0216 1000 USD per person	0.0123 1000 USD per person	0.0093 1000 USD per person	Barbados
2020s	0.0167 1000 USD per person	0.015 1000 USD per person	0.0017 1000 USD per person	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Barbados or China?: Barbados, at 0.0168 1000 USD per person against 0.0158 1000 USD per person in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Barbados and China?: 0.001 1000 USD per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Barbados ranks 84th and China ranks 87th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.