How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malawi?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola

0.0024 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malawi

0.0022 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Angola rank

112th

Malawi rank

113th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Angola
Malawi

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.0024 1000 USD per person against 0.0022 1000 USD per person in Malawi, a difference of 0.0002 1000 USD per person.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 112th and Malawi ranks 113th of 128 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0093 1000 USD per person	0.0021 1000 USD per person	0.0071 1000 USD per person	Angola
1970s	0.0087 1000 USD per person	0.003 1000 USD per person	0.0058 1000 USD per person	Angola
1980s	0.0069 1000 USD per person	0.0035 1000 USD per person	0.0034 1000 USD per person	Angola
1990s	0.0051 1000 USD per person	0.0022 1000 USD per person	0.0029 1000 USD per person	Angola
2000s	0.0041 1000 USD per person	0.0016 1000 USD per person	0.0025 1000 USD per person	Angola
2010s	0.003 1000 USD per person	0.0022 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	Angola
2020s	0.0026 1000 USD per person	0.0021 1000 USD per person	0.0004 1000 USD per person	Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Malawi?: Angola, at 0.0024 1000 USD per person against 0.0022 1000 USD per person in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Malawi?: 0.0002 1000 USD per person, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malawi?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Angola and Malawi rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Angola ranks 112th and Malawi ranks 113th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/angola/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/angola/malawi/">Angola vs Malawi: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 129 places, 7,187 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.