China, Hong Kong SAR vs Papua New Guinea: Raw milk of cattle: Gross Production Value (constant) … I constant

China, Hong Kong SAR
25 1000 Int$
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
68 1000 Int$
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
236th
Papua New Guinea rank
233rd

Raw milk of cattle: Gross Production Value (constant) … I constant over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Papua New Guinea
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 68 1000 Int$ against 25 1000 Int$ in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 43 1000 Int$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 2.7 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 236th and Papua New Guinea ranks 233rd of 239 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 4 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 2,511 1000 Int$ 606.33 1000 Int$ 1,905 1000 Int$ China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 2,201 1000 Int$ 443.8 1000 Int$ 1,757 1000 Int$ China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1,382 1000 Int$ 92.6 1000 Int$ 1,290 1000 Int$ China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 294.4 1000 Int$ 58.6 1000 Int$ 235.8 1000 Int$ China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 52.8 1000 Int$ 69.1 1000 Int$ 16.3 1000 Int$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 25 1000 Int$ 72.2 1000 Int$ 47.2 1000 Int$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 25 1000 Int$ 68 1000 Int$ 43 1000 Int$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value, China, Hong Kong SAR or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 68 1000 Int$ against 25 1000 Int$ in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value between China, Hong Kong SAR and Papua New Guinea?
43 1000 Int$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Papua New Guinea rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 236th and Papua New Guinea ranks 233rd of 239 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Papua New Guinea: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i/china-hong-kong-sar/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i/china-hong-kong-sar/papua-new-guinea/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Papua New Guinea: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
Unit
1000 Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
269 places, 14,929 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.