Malaysia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malaysia
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malaysia rank
155th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
158th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malaysia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0000196119922024

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.5 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 155th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 158th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Malaysia
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malaysia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Malaysia, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Malaysia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malaysia ranks 155th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 158th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/malaysia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/malaysia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Malaysia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 8,579 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.