Malawi vs Zambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malawi
0.3039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.3038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
119th
Zambia rank
120th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malawi
  • Zambia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.3039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 119th and Zambia ranks 120th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 0.1066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0283 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0783 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 0.174 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0369 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1371 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 0.1624 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0435 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1189 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 0.1533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.2496 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2289 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 0.2899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malawi or Zambia?
Malawi, at 0.3039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malawi and Zambia?
0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Zambia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malawi ranks 119th and Zambia ranks 120th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malawi/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malawi/zambia/">Malawi vs Zambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.