Haiti vs Iceland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Haiti
0.7116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.6437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Haiti rank
97th
Iceland rank
100th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Haiti
  • Iceland
0.20.30.40.50.60.7196119922023

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 0.7116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.6437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Haiti ranks 97th and Iceland ranks 100th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2458 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4908 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.3175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.3896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4913 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.6215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1749 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
2000s 0.6641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4759 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1882 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
2010s 0.6879 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.578 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
2020s 0.7112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6368 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0744 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Haiti or Iceland?
Haiti, at 0.7116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.6437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Haiti and Iceland?
0.0679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Haiti and Iceland rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Haiti ranks 97th and Iceland ranks 100th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Haiti vs Iceland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/haiti/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/haiti/iceland/">Haiti vs Iceland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.